These days, one of the intellectually challenging preoccupations among the multitudes is the issue of purchasing stuff ranging from cars to clothes, which are produced by worldwide popular brands. I am of the firm conviction that buying luxury goods from famous brands bears more demerits than merits elucidated below.
The first and foremost reason is that a vast majority of individuals, especially affluent young adults and teenagers, are inclined to wear trendy and stylish clothes from leading brands in order to look fashionable, attractive and eccentric among their peers and also enhance their appearance. In other words, they are willing to follow fashion and the newly-launched products from global top brands, then put effort into purchasing a wide variety of them so as to flaunt and emulate, for instance BMW, Iphone cell phones, Mac cosmetics, Nike shoes and so forth. Despite the foregoing reasons, such a measure has some drawbacks, two of which are raised in the following paragraphs.
These days, the excessive demand for luxurious articles of popular brands has been increasing dramatically all around the world .Due to being stylish, not only does almost every individual allocate a chunk of time to following fashion but also they waste their time, which is the precious commodity in today’s world. Through such a measure, a plethora of people will be prone to squander their time on browsing the newest and unwanted items of various brands from different sites or shops. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Had I not spent my valuable time on buying well-known goods five years ago, I would have put my money aside.
Furthermore, a great passion about owning the invaluable commodities of the leading brands would be accompanied with negative and adverse effects on every singular person due to the fact that it might lead them to be distracted from education. Moreover, those who have desire to possess the stuff of top brands will be less likely to pursue their academic education at prestigious universities ,and also 80 percent of them quit their study at initial levels according to the new research published by American Sociological Association in the year of 2018.
To sum it up, to my mind, interests in owning articles of popular brands not only may result in distracting public’s attention from other matters such as education but also will lead to wasting their time. Hence, I do believe that the dark sides of this issue outnumber the bright sides.
26 November,2019
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... into purchasing a wide variety of them so as to flaunt and emulate, for instance BMW, I...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...easing dramatically all around the world .Due to being stylish, not only does almo...
^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...sing dramatically all around the world .Due to being stylish, not only does almost ...
^^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ic education at prestigious universities ,and also 80 percent of them quit their s...
^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: COMMA_MONTH_DATE[1]
Message: The comma is probably incorrect: 'November 2019'.
Suggestion: November 2019
...s issue outnumber the bright sides. 26 November,2019
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, as to, for instance, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80319445442 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617433414044 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9314168283 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.153846154 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7692307692 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136860468847 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046830177431 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439177595494 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719396711351 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164094956598 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.