With developing advanced technology plenty of jobs have been replacing with robots and this appears to be a long-term trend. However, this tendency has strong arguments for, in terms of increasing productivity as well as decreasing the final costs of goods and against, in terms of growing unemployment rate among labourers. Personally, from my point of view, progress always comes at a cost and it worth applying in particular in monotonous and precision work.
To begin with, the application of machines in productions may increase productivity and precision. This is because devices always surpass humanity in endurance and strength and never get tired of carrying out tedious work. In other words, computing algorithms may work almost autonomous refusing the respite and day off and apparently fulfil not only monotonous tasks but also heavy job. For instance, packing boxes with goods and carry them to transports. Furthermore, machines can work without financial motivation which also would affect the productivity and costs of goods. To clarify, robots can work without incentives that are in marked contrast to a human being, who hardly ever would work without rewarding, pay increments or perks. Therefore, the final costs of goods produced by machines would not include salary cost.
Nevertheless, there is a strong flaw of supersede human labour by machines. This may happen because of the effectiveness of automation producing jeopardizes millions of unskilled workers. In short term, it may give rise to a large underclass of unemployed people who should be supported by authorities. This situation can deteriorate on a large scale it might bring about poverty and social instability and unrest.
In conclusion, cutting-edge technology has already been implemented in many companies displacing human employees. This tendency has both advantages such as enhancing productivity and decreasing costs of goods and drawbacks such as the growth of the unemployment rate. In my opinion, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erty and social instability and unrest. In conclusion, cutting-edge technology h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in short, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49206349206 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04172048224 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612698412698 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4819511602 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.764705882 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2352941176 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150134716999 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449725712623 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319227652927 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812925936916 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295848829787 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.