It is undeniable that the carbon footprint has increased dramatically due to the action of using aircraft. To that end, it is claimed that the very way to diminish environmental contamination is by increasing the cost of plane tickets. Personally, I do not agree with it and believe it may only aggravate existing air pollution rather than resolve it and may negatively affect the economy of some countries.
To begin with, a lot of airlines have already implemented schemes for offsetting carbon emissions. It would mean that overpriced tickets would decrease demand on flights and force people to change their means of transportation. Hence, it can cut offsetting of carbon dioxide and may give rise to exacerbating the issue of emissions from cars that contained damaging pollutant particles for the environment altogether. Therefore, expensive air tickets discourage passenger, enforcing them using different vehicles that also polluters.
Moreover, for many countries, particularly for far-flung peninsulas and islands, flying is the only way to be engaged with others. For this reason, increasing-price in air tickets tends to affect the way of commuting and affordability for tourists. To put it another way, decreasing number to tourist ultimately cut the enrichment of local budgets and make this tourists destination less affordable to people and less competitive on the global market. For instance, hardly ever American passengers would choose Thailand as the next tourist destination if it would cost a fortune. Thus, the lack of enrichment to budget impact not only the economy but also the standard of living of residents.
In conclusion, according to some people who provided increasing air tickets, the environmental pollutant might be tackled. However, I disagree that it tends to encourage people to use other means of transportation rising the number of different polluters and it may affect the economy since it will lead to a reducing the number of tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...richment of local budgets and make this tourists destination less affordable to people a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37620578778 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11483466225 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8669007017 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275588491695 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858901956715 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748600083834 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162477188229 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324876367218 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.