Technology has become an integral part of our life, eventually, it can be seen that technology such as laptops and tablets increasingly number opportunity for teleworking whether at home or travel. This tendency has strong arguments for such as working in a suitable place and pace and against such as an abundance of procrastination that hinders the working process. Personally, in my opinion, the ability to be mobile without a strict workplace outweigh its flaws.
To begin with, mobility of being outside the workplace means that can people work not only in a suitable place with comfortable atmosphere but also in suitable pace. Otherwise, hardly ever they would choose to work remotely. To clarify, workplaces seem to be designed for themselves with a comfortable chair and acceptable respite. Furthermore, people’s schedule appears to be maintained regarding their personal habits and necessity. For instance, taking offspring to school without rash and undertaking tasks without hustle and bustle in comfortable and more productive time. It is therefore clear that, sense of freedom from a strict schedule and workplace worth telecommuting.
Nevertheless, there is a huge drawback in the form of procrastination from work. It would mean that maintain working capacity and efficient surrounding would require a lot of willpower from employees. In other words, numerous numbers procrastinating things may ruin the whole work process and fail to meet deadline altogether. To illustrate, watching a favourite TV show, scrolling sites, chatting with friends or lounge around on a beach may distract from fulfilling tasks. Therefore, only a persistent person may overcome procrastination and enjoy mobility, while others may suffer from the unwillingness to work.
In conclusion, cutting-edge technology has already become a useful tool to make money remotely whether at home or on a trip. This trend has advantages such as suitable place and routine and drawbacks such as distractions that procrastinate from undertaking work. From my point of view, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53105590062 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18794681566 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599378881988 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9272621569 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.764705882 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.52941176471 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166295760131 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503995759411 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348416513118 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100206832956 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400197264117 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.