More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development

It is generally considered that in this tech-savvy world numerous humans put their personal information online like address, contact number and so on for purpose such as signing for new account for social networks and web banking. It is a positive development due to people can find job easily and they can transfer money in a minute.

To commence with, they can find job easily. To make it more clear, by the help of social networks some students can upload their data to achieve good jobs so, like contact number and their personal information and their study certificate which is acceptable by some companies and they can direct call to the candidate and easily meet with people. To epitome, a survey was conducted by the Canadian organizations found in the 2021 that their 70% employees came in their company from the advertisement because company was uploaded their job vacancy on the internet. Hence, they can upload their job forms online.

Further strengthening the views, they can do easily money transaction. To explain it, there are many bank related application available on the internet and individuals download this applications on their mobile phones and they open and start their new account in any back and they can transfer their money without visit the bank. To cite an example, a headline was published in "THE MOSCOW TIMES" newspaper revealed that above the millions of people upload their banking detail with contact number in the google pay, paytm application which is easily accessible for them. Therefore, mature people cannot need to go bank and no need to sign an paper.

In conclusion, it could be said that it is a good development for people get the employment and do not need to go to the bank for any work they can do from their home.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... candidate and easily meet with people. To epitome, a survey was conducted by the ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...y can upload their job forms online. Further strengthening the views, they can do ea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'banks'?
Suggestion: banks
...nsaction. To explain it, there are many bank related application available on the in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n the internet and individuals download this applications on their mobile phones and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...not need to go bank and no need to sign an paper. In conclusion, it could be sa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91390728477 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62641859684 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533112582781 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.9826066385 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287309166345 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103001566821 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103231982926 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196736672219 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110997019389 0.056905535591 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.