Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?
It is sometimes suggested that the authority should be responsible for providing funding for artists on the grounds that they earn a little amount of money. Nonetheless, I am totally against this idea as it is awfully wrong headed.
At the outset, there is no denying artists can reap a lot of benefits from many non profit organizations or international companies which value their genuine talent in the field of art. These organizations can make a great contribution to their career prospects by means of providing them opportunities and advertise their works across the world at many famous auctions. This definitely makes it possible for them to get a basic income to afford their daily needs
Another noteworthy point is that nowadays, artists are likely to find it much easier and convenient to seek for a job. This is due to the fact that there is an upsurge in the demand for creative people. In all probability, thanks to the development of technology, artists will be capable of working online as a motion graphics designer, a logo designer or an illustrator. Not only does this help them to be able to make money in distinct ways but it also provides them golden chances to gain deeper understanding, get more experience by means of doing different jobs as well as working with people from all over the world.
To sum up, I think it is not essential for artists to receive financial help from the government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, so, well, i think, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83385847434 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624489795918 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1392062326 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.444444444 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239610530888 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893664189718 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517945318755 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139327127911 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00460719039432 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.