Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money. Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors. What are the reasons for this problem? How can it be solved?
Over the past decades, there has been a worrying phenomenon that the lack of medical personnel in the countryside is significantly more adverse because most doctors would like to be employed by hospitals in the city which commit them more earnings. This has entailed detrimental negative impacts on the stability and balance of the national medical workforce. This essay will examine some major contributing to this trend and propose possible solutions to combat it.
One of the main culprits resulting in this common trend would lie on the fact that the salary and benefit packages in urban hospitals are far more attractive than rural areas. People might have the tendency to choose a generously-paid job after occupying themselves several years on researching and having hard work done in the university, and medical students are not the exception. As a result, they would prefer contributing to city hospitals, where the amount of patients is enormous, which means doctors could get a higher salary in return. Another factor adding to this issue would be related to the disparity in living standard between cosmopolitan cities and rural provinces. Being a doctor is a demanding profession, hence those working in this field desire for a deluxe lifestyle including housing, car,entertainment facilities or other services, which is not always available in the rustic areas.
To resolve this problem, there are several measures that could be offered. One of the most prominent steps would be that fringe benefits for doctors working in rural hospitals should be enhanced by the government. To be more detailed, bonuses could be rewarded for fresh graduated medical students if they chose to devote themselves to those institutes. Family insurance might be another approach to support this solution because when medical doctors feel they are considered important, they would apply their whole minds to the duty. In addition, workforce distribution should be taken into consideration. This means not all the doctors graduating from medical schools can work in their favorable places. It strongly depends on their academic and practical skills.
In conclusion, factors stemming from preference to work at hospitals in town have led to the shortage of medical staff in the countryside. Yet, if the government and individuals share collective responsibilities, it will become possible to offer feasible solutions to tackle the problem.
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience Write at least 250 wo 84
- Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors What are the reasons for this problem How can it be solved 94
- Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors What are the reasons for this problem How can it be solved 91
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What are the causes of the problem What measures can governments take to solve this problem 84
- Some people fear that technology is gradually taking over control of our lives while others think that it has led to many positive developments in all aspects of their lives Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer a 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...sible solutions to combat it. One of the main culprits resulting in this comm...
Line 3, column 814, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , entertainment
... deluxe lifestyle including housing, car,entertainment facilities or other services, which is ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2061.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39528795812 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91496701559 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573298429319 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9586607039 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.235294118 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4705882353 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321555743751 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096946254261 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546960431225 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180438584141 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677844070558 0.056905535591 119% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.