It is often opined that workplaces are second home of people since they spend a significant part of their life there. So it is indispensable to employer regarding provision of requirement or expectation of employees in the light of the fact that it would have direct effect on people well-being. In my point of view, this matter is an inevitable issue and head of companies and firms should take it as a serious issue so that it result in both more improvement and productivity.
Some services that are apt for job satisfaction of employee such as: appropriate health insurance, flexible work hours and some gazing bonus could readily contribute to progress in workplaces. Being aware of privileges that are waiting for them at the end of the month, employees would unify their effort to meet them promptly. Though, this efforts and ambitious would not only contribute to achievement of productivity, but would also lead to being more adept in their career indirectly. For example, there are a wide of organization in Iran possessed luxury hotels and exclusive beaches in the north of country. They would consider each month a three night holidays in their hotels as a reward to their hardworking employees.
Maybe, some assert that these bonuses are feasible to gain, although they could be accessible by hardship and persistence. In order to Provision of the privileges rewarded to employer and workers, employers are in need of fare economic resources. However, this issue could be compensated by high spirit and ambition of their privileges. By having active and competence employees, job satisfaction would be realistic too. As a matter of the fact, they acquire their definite right in place of their deeds.
Put it into a nutshell, it would be wise if employers take effective actions with respect to having elements that would bring about well-being for their workers. Not only would these factors contribute to more improvement in their majors, but it would also cause more productivity for their companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r effort to meet them promptly. Though, this efforts and ambitious would not only co...
^^^^
Line 3, column 515, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'wides'?
Suggestion: wides
...er indirectly. For example, there are a wide of organization in Iran possessed luxur...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, for example, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10240963855 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86574186061 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9223950936 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197733999821 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650561269289 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583424867558 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115125937825 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172735231381 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.