In most successful organisations, some people believe that communications between managers and workers are important, other people said that other factors are more important.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
<span style="font-size: 18.15px;">There is a variety of views which opine that the face to face interactions between the employers and the employees plays an integral part in a successful company. Others think that it depends on many other factors. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument, and then I will give my own perspective on the matter.
On the one hand, direct communication between the supervisors and their workers is crucial for a host of reasons. The first reason is the comprehension of each other. To explain, since the tasks are discussed with the executive openly, employees may be grasped their works. As a result, they can enhance the level of their job performance. The second reason I would like to mention is to facilitate narrowing the distance between them. The fact that a warm environment, which is created by the president, can boost his employees mentally. Therefore, it can improve productivity efficiently.
On the other hand, there is a wide range of other factors that are more essential. On the first place, the competent individuals are an inevitable aspect. For example, an abundance of technological giants where gather a lot of talented engineers can be a core reason to build their fame and fortune. On the second place, salary is another key factor. If people can gain a high paid job which allows them to meet their needs, such as buying a house and a car, they may be dedicated completely to their duty. Thus, it can result in an increase in their yield.
In conclusion, although the supervisor communicating with their employees can have merits in the enhancement of companies’ success. However, to balance, I assert that gifted people and salary play more pivotal roles.</span><br>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08996539792 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22475384609 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584775086505 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1714607142 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7222222222 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172203815801 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536885006129 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593660747915 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104651644493 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258707634687 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.