Nowadays as cities are developing and globalizing there is also an increase in population as well as traffic. Although some people believe that there is only one significant way to lower the amount of traffic just by stop people being travel from home to the workplace or school, I completely disagree with this statement as it has a few detrimental effects on society and people.
Firstly, there are several employers that are going to work every day. Those Employers need some infrastructure and types of equipment as well to complete the job, It is not possible for everyone to have that equipment and infrastructure at home and also not everyone can afford to have those. Moreover, people find the spirit to work at the workplace and it helps them to work hard to achieve success. In contrast, if they work at home the chance of talking with the colleagues will reduce eventually and also they can feel more stress than usual.
On the other hand, students can find a lot of friends in schools or colleges. If they stop going to school they may not able to have better guidance from a teacher along with that they can not develop their skills like dancing, singing, and other sports. As they are at home they can feel bored, alone, and even sometimes they might lose the ability to socialize.
Besides work and education, doing shopping online has undeniable advantages though it is better to shop in a traditional way because they can not be able to check the quality of the product and also whether it is suitable for the person or not. Buying vegetables online is not a suggestive method as the vegetables might be spoiled or unhygienic so it is better to go and shop in a traditional way.
To sum up, there are several ways to reduce the amount of traffic and decreasing the need to travel to work and education from home is not one of them. The government should make people to use public transport for traveling and it helps to reduce the traffic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... advantages though it is better to shop in a traditional way because they can not be able to check t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hygienic so it is better to go and shop in a traditional way. To sum up, there are several ways...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to go and shop in a traditional way. To sum up, there are several ways to red...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, well, even so, in contrast, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65804597701 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55661712458 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491379310345 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7075636476 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756430370735 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291611240887 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351456934764 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429189608463 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293626679856 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.