In most successful organizations, some people believe that communications between managers and workers is important, while other people say that other factors are more important. What is your opinion?
One of the key factors to achieve success in any type of business in this digital era is thought to be effective communication between the subordinates and the director. On the one hand, i am inclined to believe that mutual connections between members can be established thanks to regular communication. On the other hand, hardly can we overlook the pivotal role that individual capabilities and expertise play.
To assess the profound effects of communication in the workplace, we must bring mutual understanding into focus. Assuming an employer took his time to get to know his employees, he would find the right way to manage and inspire them to perform more productively. Not only can it build rapport and trust, two qualities of which are required for teamwork, but personal conflicts can also be minimised in the work environment. In addition, a satisfying corporate culture means pleased staff, which ultimately results in improving the firm's revenue. Google, a tech giant, for instance, provides its employees with privacy recreational facilities.
Although so far, one can readily draws the conclusion that the connection between inferiors and superiors is of paramount importance, we must put their skill sets into perspective before judging whether which is better than which. The more time spent on controlling one's emotions, the less potential problems arise. Being effected or controlled by one's moods, people, especially those who have managerial positions, might make snap decisions which tend to results in enterprise's collapse. On top of that, a staff could be promoted to higher role if he or she had extensive networking with powerful people.
Taking both sides into consideration, they point me to the conclusion that in principle, communication is rather crucial in the workplace, but in practice, there are many factors at play. From my personal perspective, both communication and set of skills must be practiced in the corporate world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ates and the director. On the one hand, i am inclined to believe that mutual conn...
^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firms'' or 'firm's'?
Suggestion: firms'; firm's
...ich ultimately results in improving the firms revenue. Google, a tech giant, for inst...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'draw'
Suggestion: draw
...es. Although so far, one can readily draws the conclusion that the connection betw...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ich. The more time spent on controlling ones emotions, the less potential problems a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'result'.
Suggestion: result
...might make snap decisions which tend to results in enterprises collapse. On top of that...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for instance, in addition, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33440514469 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04984558458 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662379421222 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.271685807 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0863662852645 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286903886893 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281719557911 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550726935538 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375389360275 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.