In today's world, the news we read or see is totally based on what the news editors show us. Many factors are involved in the process to decide what to be broadcast and what to be printed. Unfortunately, new editors have the sole responsibility in deciding these.
While the decision lies with these editors, many factors influence their decisions. One of them is audience preference. For instance, since readers these days prefer watching television more than reading newspapers, editors decide to show certain news through television broadcast. Furthermore, news editors believe that viewers these days prefer watching controversies and gossip rather than quality news. As a result, we see irrelevant controversial news throughout the day.
Since the editors decide what news should be shown to us, there is a chance that we can be used to watching bad news. Most of the news that we see or read these days are good news. But, many a times, news channels broadcast irrelevant and repetitive content. For instance, several times news channels keep repeating the same news for the entire day. Showing an actor's child talking his first word is not what is quality news. As we see such poor quality news everyday, we get used to watching it. However, if quality news would broadcast, it would have a better impact.
If news editors would report good quality news to audience, there would be a better awareness among audience. People would know the real issues of the world and come together to make life better. To conclude, since news editors decide what to broadcast on television and newspaper, they should report quality news through the most widely used news resource.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ead these days are good news. But, many a times, news channels broadcast irrelevant and...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'actors'' or 'actor's'?
Suggestion: actors'; actor's
...ame news for the entire day. Showing an actors child talking his first word is not wha...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... news. As we see such poor quality news everyday, we get used to watching it. However, i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04316546763 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58245324221 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510791366906 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6245333738 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8888888889 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4444444444 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482736079989 0.244688304435 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17166618553 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899678588888 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336932886731 0.151304729494 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054658308525 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.