Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places

It is often believed that travelling to different places gives one a lot of exposure and knowledge of the world. Therefore, nowadays, more and more people have begun travelling to places that have difficult conditions, which may have a negative or a positive impact on the traveller. This essay will discuss both views.

The main reason why people visit places with unfavourable conditions is to gain experience. For instance, people from tropical countries travel to colder regions to enjoy the low temperatures as they would not experience it in their own country. Furthermore, many young individuals deliberately plan to have adventurous trips to extreme places for some thrill and excitement. To sum up, tourists visit places with difficult climatic conditions because it satisfies their need to experience something new and charismatic.

On the contrary, travelling to places with unfavourable have certain adverse effects on the visitor. When people visit a place that has an extreme climatic condition, they may suffer several health problems. Sahara desert, for example, has a dry and sunny climate which may cause sunburn and loo. Also, places like Kashmir and Afghanistan, that are regularly affected by war, may not be safe to visit. Hence, it is quite risky for an individual to travel places with critical conditions.

To conclude, although travelling to different places gives a life-time experience and a feeling of achievement, safety should be considered above everything. Life is precious and nothing is more important than that. If one wants to plan to visit places where conditions are difficult, proper arrangements and checks should be made before the travel to avoid any misery.

Votes
Average: 6.9 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the contrary, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37546468401 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89220286502 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598513011152 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4227500623 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289026205143 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093370229574 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553115843478 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170167586567 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278430403895 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.