In recent years, technology has revolutionized the ways in which people stay contact with faraway friends and relatives. A growing number of people are choosing to socialize online instead of having face-to-face interactions. In my opinion, this is a negative development which can lead to internet fraud and some embarrassing problems later in life.
Undeniably, the convenience, together with time-saving efficiency offered by online socialization, is the greatest appeal. For example, during the period of COVID-19, many governments have imposed lockdown on major cities, requiring everybody to hunker down at home to curb the spread of the virus. During the days of social distancing and shutdown, socializing online provides access to staying connected with families or friends. Therefore, the virtual world behind the computer screen temporarily helps people reduce the stress caused by social isolation or quarantine. However, this does not necessarily imply that face-to-face interaction can be replaced by the internet.
In fact, there are some dangers lurking behind the cyber world. The first serious problem arising from socializing online is internet fraud. Many people use fake identities to access others’ personal information. For instance, some impostors might be disguised as poor people who are desperate for cash. Nevertheless, these immoral scammers will cut off contact with the victim forever when they cheat him or her out of money.
Second, confidential information leakage is also a serious problem many people are concerned about. For example, many young girls might upload their private photos online. Then, some scammers might photoshop their pictures, thereby blackmailing them into posting those photos on the internet.
In conclusion, the negative impacts of online interaction far outweigh the benefits it can bring to people. Although it has become more popular for people to socialize through the internet, it has brought about too many problems for this to be considered a positive trend. Hence, people should be cautious about interacting with others on the internet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61755485893 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87406626166 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9456571521 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3157894737 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36842105263 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251223077157 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715647843915 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882330049178 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135723068536 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870268176176 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.