Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
The trend towards scientists using animals to test medical experiments is increasingly prevalent. People think that it should be prohibited due to its savagery, while others say that it is for the sake of humanity. In my opinion, although this practice has widely been applied in most countries, the life of animals is more important.
According to people's perspectives, animals are used for medical experiments because humans cannot test themselves to observe the reaction of drugs. It is often full of risks, which can be attributed to potential negative impacts caused to humans' bodies such as allergy or side effects. However, some animals such as rats and goats are found to have similar bodily mechanisms compared to humans and thus instead of testing on humans themselves, scientists can take advantage of this similarity to bring experimental outcomes to life.
Apart from the reason expressed above, I believe that restrictions on using animals for medical experiments should be implemented because of their survival. It is unnecessary to sacrifice an animal's life as they have a right to live, and their lives should not be taken for the sake of humanity. Instead, alternative methods such as using human cells and tissues should be introduced. Not only does this ensure the existence of animals but it also prevents the mentioned risks from happening in the first place.
In conclusion, the practice towards the use of animals in medical experiments is widely applied throughout the world. Although this is beneficial for humans to some extent, I, however, believe that the protection of animals' lives by using alternatives should be introduced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ls is more important. According to peoples perspectives, animals are used for medi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...ival. It is unnecessary to sacrifice an animals life as they have a right to live, and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, while, apart from, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85050673734 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552631578947 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6799546133 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306027490966 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123799414657 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603419659802 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206807048051 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388368795578 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.