Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world, unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
In this contemporary epoch, pilgrimages play part and parcel role in every country. Therefore, it has become the biggest industry in the world. Regrettably, few people rely on international tourism to make trouble then understanding between folks from different cultures. I totally disagree with this notion and I am going to explore my viewpoints before reaching a reasonable summation.
There are various numbers of benefits of tourism, travelers are exploring host countries' heritage places and the tradition in this modern world. Therefore, those are too polite inhabitants, who show their good etiquette. Moreover, traversing spending their hard-earned money to another nation. These kinds of work help a lot in a country, which country has many numbers of tourism rates.
Secondly, the inheritances of any country are a precious part of their country, after elucidating by tourism it makes more eminent. Travelers show decent behavior to other folks, it had dropped an adequate impact on other countries' masses. Therefore, mostly traversing's inhabitants are educated of these kinds of manners, then it cannot make trouble alloying in folks. Moreover, in their distinguished intellectual.
Thirdly, there are some certain masses that have the worst intentions and habits which they got from their host country. Likewise, using vulgar words, producing pollution, against authorities created a system, sadly, these kinds of things done by pilgrimage, however, governments have to take strict actions than avoiding it because tourists have an immense effect on every country.
To sum up that, through jaunting, every region is getting many positive impacts on their GDP. Authorities could be concern about traversing and apply some crucial precautions to travelers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67286245353 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88299490038 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4769681003 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8125 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14503303778 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462355051676 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805750231406 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752136818052 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870172588685 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.