Nowadays, most of research work in the field of medical is done by funding to improve the way of treatment and medicine. By improving the quality of drugs and therapy will help mobs live healthy life. However question is always rises who may took the responsibility of exploring the medical field. In my point of view governments should take it on this back.
To begin with, if the research work will drive by the government there will be a high chances for people to getting better result out of it because they are accountable to public and all research work will be paid by the money of tax. That means the work will be valuable for he society if it’s not done for personal benefit.
Secondly all of this research work will always be transparent for folks due to a no third party involvement. So the results and precautions are realistic and unbiased
probing further, if the funding and research team comes from the same institute there will can be chance of fabrable outcome. For example examination over a new drug goes through various test which takes serval years to done and no granted of agreeable result. So it becomes hard for the scientists for stand parallel in these circumstances. Therefore, it should be controlled and funded by the government because there will be a less chances of conflicts between a two indivisioul bodies.
To sum up , I would like to say that government should have control this. but it’s been a wonderful task for if they remove all chances for research companies. Therefore, Government has to implements some strong policies so outcome will be unbiased and realistic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...erapy will help mobs live healthy life. However question is always rises who may took t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for the society'?
Suggestion: for the society
...x. That means the work will be valuable for he society if it's not done for personal bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d precautions are realistic and unbiased probing further, if the funding and rese...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Probing
...cautions are realistic and unbiased probing further, if the funding and research te...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: NOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...st which takes serval years to done and no granted of agreeable result. So it beco...
^^
Line 6, column 431, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the government because there will be a less chances of conflicts between a two indi...
^^^^
Line 6, column 436, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'chance'?
Suggestion: chance
...government because there will be a less chances of conflicts between a two indivisioul ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...licts between a two indivisioul bodies. To sum up , I would like to say that gov...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a two indivisioul bodies. To sum up , I would like to say that government sho...
^^
Line 8, column 75, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...at government should have control this. but it's been a wonderful task for if ...
^^^
Line 8, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...outcome will be unbiased and realistic.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, as to, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86690647482 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71062072295 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0146383097 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6428571429 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16641948001 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645656377609 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671416555006 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101485941508 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625040254385 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.