Nowadays more and more older people compete with young people for the same jobs. What can be the reasons for this? What would you suggest as a solution?
It is universally acknowledged that " work is worship". Therefore, everyone wants to engage with a job or business to lead aristocratic lifestyle. Presently, competitiveness between young and Grey-haired employees in the working sectors has become the serious contender in this era of modernization. Majority of elderly people fight with young blood for distinct jobs and therefore the mettle of youth employees is supposed to be at back seat at work place. Here, I would like to account for reasons and remedies to address this worrying issue.
There are multifarious reasons behind this phenomenon. First and foremost, senior employees have vast experience,knowledge and supreme strategies for making quality decisions which ensure the rapid growth,longer existence and productivity of working segments. To demonstrate, having remarkable knowledge and experience not only prevent a firm from a massive loss during the time of recession but also the ability of well- experienced employees to make quality decisions enhance the production process. By contrast, young people who are inexperienced cannot make quality decisions during critical time. Consequently, old aged workers are believed to be the real asset for a business sector. What is more, experienced aged workers have a great reputation, achievements, patience, tolerance and ability to cope up with enormous pressure at work place where as modern employees are aggressive and have less patience under gigantic workload. Hence, such traits make them matchless and their importance in working sectors is the need of hour.
Numerous remedial measures can be taken to vanish this problem. Initially, young people must be taught with some exceptional skills and strategies to deal with difficult task so that they can become more invaluable than experienced old generation. Besides this, it is extremely paramount to aware companies regarding strength of youthful bee's. To justify, unlike late adulthood, youngsters are agile, healthy and the owner of luxurious working hours.
To recapitulate, working sectors have undergone substantial changes over a couple of decades. The potential of youngsters appears to be fading up at workplace. Thus, it is significant for for business sector to select young blood for different jobs so that they could make their future bright.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , knowledge
...t, senior employees have vast experience,knowledge and supreme strategies for making quali...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , longer
... decisions which ensure the rapid growth,longer existence and productivity of working s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 849, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...up with enormous pressure at work place where as modern employees are aggressive and hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...p at workplace. Thus, it is significant for for business sector to select young blood f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62816901408 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10306463307 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619718309859 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7015916956 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.157894737 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2696704357 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723024595381 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633146026742 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162625047135 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324778091907 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.