Nowadays most people are not as and active, as they were in the past. What are the main causes of this solution? Suggest some possible solutions.
It is a fact that humans are more inactive and unfit than their ancestors at present. Although there will undoubtedly be some negative consequences of this trend, governments can take some steps to alleviate this potential problem.
Thanks to the advent of technology people are not keen on physical activities like sports, which may lead to a sedentary lifestyle. In fact, most of them prefer to glue their eyes on the computer screens rather than taking part in the outdoor activities. For example, many students spend their free time playing video games or surfing Facebook after classes. In addition, in the past people used to walk to the working place, which helps them strengthen their health, however, with the support of public transport system, they become more lazy and dependent these days.
There are several actions that could be taken to solve the related problem. First, arranging appropriate time to do exercise regularly helps people avoid health problems. For instance, they should join in the fitness club to practice a kind of sport such as yoga or gym before going to work. Second, government needs to run more awareness campaigns to promote the benefits of walking. Parks should be widen to save space for outdoor games, this may attract the large number of participants to involve in.
In conclusion, people become less active owning to sitting jobs and furthermore, they spend too much time on technology, however, the matter can be dealt by conducting health programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...an their ancestors. The main reasons of this problems are people lack physical exerc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07114624506 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53663805929 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3642849929 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6428571429 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167359729691 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473420703123 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447142391584 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095770949073 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023309753218 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.