Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to?
This century leads the technology era and known as modem decades. The recent few decades are the witness of the development in technology sector amid this development there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to his phenomenon new thing are replaced to old one or broken things without repairing it. There are several problems occur through it. Lot of potential solutions are taken to prevent this problem. I will try to throw light upon both view as well as perspective about it.
To commence with, we are enamoured by fancy and lucrative commodities. There are multifarious issue due to use and throw culture. The remarkable reason is advancement of technology. To be justified at the recent time, all the commodities are available at very nominal rate and people have affordable budget to buy
that things. Hence, they feel broken object are replaced with new one instead of thinking about repair that objects. The another predominant cause is that people are never appreciate the old materialistic as they replace with new which have the latest features and technology, this may result to make convenient life. Last but not the least, advertisement is key reason to attract the people with updated version of having such electronic or other items. Consequently, they get influenced by that product as we as they old one is not working.
On the other side of spectrum, lot of possible solutions are taken to mitigate the problem. Firstly, people keep piling up thing that are broken and replace it through new one. Then, old electronic products are not vanished completely, since it is brunt, it spread lot of dangerous Rays in atmosphere which causes the air pollution. As well as they lead to harmful impacts on the human health, Because this product exhaust carbon monoxide or lithium gas in environment people consume it via breath and they get suffered from Serious disease such as. Asthma and blood pressure. Lastly, the thrown products reserve large portion of land till sites as it is not a renewable. Thereby, lot of burden are put on the Government. Furthermore government have to spend a lot of money to keep this product and migrate it to that place where it can be burnt since people do not have suffered from this scarce of facilities in that proper place. As a result, people blam on the government without think to take steps to halt the problem.
Aggelomerating, all the points to conclude that the problem of the use and throw culture has detrimental effect as well as the cause of this problem is depend on the human activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... will try to throw light upon both view as well as perspective about it. To commence wi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and people have affordable budget to buy that things. Hence, they feel broken obj...
^^^
Line 6, column 723, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ot of burden are put on the Government. Furthermore government have to spend a lot of money...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 153, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...as well as the cause of this problem is depend on the human activities.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, may, so, then, well, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 437.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90846681922 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69643685183 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524027459954 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.462461588 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2083333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240610635462 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062245065575 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598669449757 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126720019736 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470538093635 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.