Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to?
It is a widely held belief that consumers should fix broken items, but there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that it is better to change a broken commodity with new one. The causes of this phenomenon are varied, and in my opinion this is adversely affecting the society as a whole.
There two main reasons that people do not prefer renovate fractured items. First of all, nowadays fixing and buying some goods are money and people have to pay immense coin for both service. Moreover, now, repairing cost is equally with items price. For example, if person broke own smartphone’s screen, the replacing will cost approximately 150 dollars while new telephone’s price is about 120 dollars in the market. As s result, society members tend to acquire the latest commodity.
Secondly, all items are manmade and have their own features and problems. Therefore consumers do not believe that fractured item does not come back previous quality, do not ameliorate condition and work properly after the fixing. This can be illustrated by the example of that car that has engine problem never work as a previous mood. Thereby, drivers harry up to change engine or buy other car brand.
This trend, as a matter of fact, is having severe influences on the environment. If people throw away their broken things, it deteriorates environment and damage nature habitat. According to researchers, smartphone and laptop battery has toxic and chemical emission, that destroy soil and water consist. More importantly, every disposing items is waste and trash that aggravate country’s beauty and surround.
In conclusion, the effect of this trend can be seen as negative concerning with environment deterioration and other ailments. Understanding that the origins of problem mainly come from studying strain and tempting modern application, consumers should take remedial steps to resolve such problems. Moreover, people should fix any fractured thing properly in order to save environment and own health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s tend to acquire the latest commodity. Secondly, all items are manmade and have...
^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d have their own features and problems. Therefore consumers do not believe that fractured...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28703703704 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84026258041 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0834392083 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157634378407 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042535332363 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040123318064 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821045503168 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338700815483 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.