Some people think that family has the most important influence on children’s development, while others believe that factors such as TV, friends, music and books have a more significant impact. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is a widely held belief that parents play a crucial role on children’s development. But there are strong counter-arguments by a section of people who think that TV programs, music, mates, books are influential on children’s upbringing. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in the light on several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
One point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that caregivers are able to help to identify children’s dreams and wishes and ask from their offspring what is his/her the preference. After the family discussion, both sides can decide which area suitable for the juvenile. For instance, minors tell their loved ones that they prefer to be a tennis player or composer. Consequently, parents will cover all financial costs related to the training and support their child. Moreover, well-wishers are able to give advice to their children from real-life and tell the pros and cons of society.
On the other hand, TV, music, book, friends can influence youth life and choice. For example, dreams can be woken up when teenagers watch the Olympic Games and World Cups and they might decide to be professional athletes. Also, when pupils read novels and they can aspire to be a writer. Music and concerts have the power to inspire young people to take to their hand musical instruments.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that family, and music, book, TV, close mates are able to ameliorate children’s mindset. Moreover, if the children’s environment will be well-balanced, they can be versatile, hyper-informed and savvy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16363636364 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06386888786 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4922493042 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201249081944 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704076427936 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627784874574 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126344497711 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457698879954 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.