Nowadays the number of cars on road is increasing incrementally. In order to change this trends strict road tolls should be paid on busy roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In the new era, the rising rate of motor vehicles is a worldwide crucial problem. There is strong arguments amongst section of people that main roads in the country should be charged with money. I totally agree that road payment is necessary to cut down and decrease transports.
Firstly, cars are the main necessity and luxury for society members. According to UN data, every four people on the Earth have their own car. Undoubtedly, people views that transport solves city connection problems and helps to thrifty times. However, growing numerous of vehicles lead to traffic jam in the large cities. As a result, during the traffic congestion amount of car waste and toxic grow up sharply that deteriorate air pollution. Also over-crowded road and magistral aggravate people' health. For instance, in Almaty, the largest city of Kazakhstan, during the rash-hour inhabitants spend two hour to get to home after the work. In my opinion, traffic jam is devastating situation that drivers and bus passengers lose their nerve and passion.
Secondly, many countries divide million dollars every year in order to build and repair routes. Tremendous number of traffics damage and deteriorate road quality. In my opinion, legislature should set up law which obliges road payment on the busy part of city or countryside.
Finally, money that amass from road toll has to spend to solve health and air pollution matters. Moreover authority should high-quality roads and huge amount of budget is needed. Therefore, state could spend money that collected from drivers for road fixing.
To sum up, it is clear that main causes if road congestion and air pollution are huge amount of transports. This society matter can be decreased by road toll.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are strong arguments'?
Suggestion: There are strong arguments
...ehicles is a worldwide crucial problem. There is strong arguments amongst section of people that main roa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...numerous of vehicles lead to traffic jam in the large cities. As a result, during...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...sharply that deteriorate air pollution. Also over-crowded road and magistral aggrava...
^^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...ing the rash-hour inhabitants spend two hour to get to home after the work. In my op...
^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...on. Secondly, many countries divide million dollars every year in order to build an...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir routes. Tremendous number of traffics damage and deteriorate road quality. In ...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...solve health and air pollution matters. Moreover authority should high-quality roads and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16254416961 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61202694534 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8884100171 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.8947368421 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208639783092 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640801625275 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577886712605 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129028376169 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428065645958 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.