Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environment conservation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people put forward the opinion that the government should build the speed transportation infrastructure. But there are strong counter arguments by a section of people who think that authority has to improve the road quality and find a way to save the country’s nature. I am of the opinion that this matter should be debated in light of several factors before any conclusion can be drawn.
First and foremost, high-speed public transports such as train, light rapid trains, trams are able to save people’s time. They can get to the final destination in one or two hours and spend their golden times with family or loved ones. For instance, the journey had taken ten hours from Almaty to Astana by Soviet unions designed old trains. Several years ago, Kazakhstan authorities have finished the rapid train railways. As a result, passengers are spending two hours between main cities of countries. People are not tired and less stressed after the voyage. They can dedicate the saved time to own development and read books or surf the Internet.
However, one point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that high-speed public transport’s infrastructure costs billions of dollars. This money can be spent to ameliorate rural and urban car roads. Since high-quality roads reduce car accidents and death tolls. Also, the state has to destroy forests and natural resorts in order to build rapid railways. If the government is to save the country’s flora and fauna, they must propagandize bicycle sport. Moreover, the authority has to provide with more cycling roads and revolutionize healthiest and cheapest lifestyle.
In conclusion, although there are a number of different points of view regarding this issue, I claim that government should ameliorate car roads in order to decrease accidents. Moreover, states have to foster the nation’s economy, enhance GDP, reduce transport ticket price and then build rapid transports.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26114649682 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89607965608 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627388535032 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6598819713 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185078439903 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497436159965 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522919340924 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107888384516 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297118767698 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.