In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
There is no doubt that, almost every good and bad field has developed significantly over the past few decades and it is too visible in the global famine. As many people have mentioned that, in many countries of around the globe rates of hunger people are increasing unexpectedly. The governments, as well as international unions, are trying to find a solution to this worldwide problem. In this essay, I intend to explore the source of this matter along with possible solutions to it.
First of all, no one can deny that, according to the recent figures, the number of people who suffer from starvation and malnourished children is increasing. As many scientists have claimed that, the main reason for this is climate change. As a result crop fields have lost, especially in Africa and East Asia. Another contributing factor is the civil war and terror attack. For example, after the conflicts in Yemen, Sudan, Syria, and Iraq, the number of refugees have sharply increased. Thousands of people have left their hometown in order to find safe shelter and staple. If would is to solve this matter, I believe we must first address its root causes. Perhaps the most effective method would be the stop war and destroy terrorist organizations net. Moreover, international unions must resolve global warming and tackle droughts in developing countries such as Sudan, Somali, Uganda. Admittedly, such intensives would probably not fully compensate these problems. However, they would at least decrease the number of people who suffer from famine.
In conclusion, I believe that this is a clearly a problem of such complexity that no solutions likely in the short term. But the combinations of measures outlined above would constitute a good first step.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 586, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
... find safe shelter and staple. If would is to solve this matter, I believe we must...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, at least, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10104529617 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72519756956 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1880545722 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1176470588 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8823529412 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160796566658 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047406708893 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507299666186 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114381792689 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478974798566 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.