Nowadays, not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries. Why? Effects on society?
In this day, there are some students don’t choosing science subjects in many universities in many countries. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn and give the reason.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of not choose science subjects at school. First, government subsidies higher education are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescent and everyone can choose any subject they want regardless of their background. This chooses support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall college enrollment rate of young people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority when they not good at science subjects, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Furthermore, nowadays, students thought that science is a theory with little practice, so they feel bored. Especially, in my country is Vietnam, students just need to remember everything in book. Second, not enough students choose science subject would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers when they can studying their favorite subjects, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once university education don’t have enough students choose science subjects. First, all students turn away from science subjects would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from courses and fees, universities could become over- reliant on the state budget, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, students not choose science subjects would tempt many problem including prestigious universities are undervalued or there are too few conditions to create many jobs related to this subject, thereby, adding great burdens for university admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting Tim that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable career paths. It, instead, there would be a more choose viable option if the resources were focused on supporting scholarship or study abroad for less privileged yet gifted students.
In conclusion, there are some advantages but in my perspective, this choosing would given many disavowed and bad effect on society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 869, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'study'
Suggestion: study
... highly qualified workers when they can studying their favorite subjects, which benefits...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'many problems'.
Suggestion: many problems
...not choose science subjects would tempt many problem including prestigious universities are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
... in my perspective, this choosing would given many disavowed and bad effect on societ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70557029178 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85952717019 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618037135279 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1330998245 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.4 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36836703548 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120647130141 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099797314374 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210961156682 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459054115951 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.