nowadays, people are encouraged to buy consumer goods. do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
People all need goods from basic to the most luxurious. Some people claim that people should be spurred to by more consumer goods to develop economic while others claim that it can reduce the quality of goods for the sake of producers’ profit. I partly agree with this trend of purchasing consumer goods.
On the one hand, it is argued that a higher amount of consumer consumption is beneficial for social development. Firstly, if the purchasing power of the market increase ceaselessly, manufacturers and producers will aim to meet the market’s demand in the production of more goods. With more tax collected from such enterprises and daily spending of individuals, government can allocate this revenue in other key sectors to upgrade the infrastructures. As a result, this might help foster the general prosperity of a country’s economy. Secondly, people’s consumption is to some extent the action of self-satisfaction. No sooner do they work assiduously than they should kill the stress by burying themselves into the amidst practical commodities. This means that the appearance of consumer goods really satiates people’s desire and facilitates their lives amazingly.
On the other hand, behind these advantages, its disadvantages should be seen significantly. It is true that the ceaselessly increasing demand of goods often coincides with the damage of environment. Actually, companies have to expand their factories and accelerate the production process, which causes detrimental impacts such as the cruel depletion of natural resources. More importantly, the world are likely to turn out to be a huge garbage because of being fraught with tons of waste released into the atmosphere on a daily basis. Besides, since the quantity is enormous to satisfy the market’s need, the quality of goods might be taken for granted, which adversely affect customers’ benefits and gradually lose their trust.
In conclusion, the benefits in favor of encouraging people to buy more goods outnumber its drawbacks, however, government should take actions to guarantee the quality of goods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fraught with tons of waste released into the atmosphere on a daily basis. Besides...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49847094801 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16377964339 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587155963303 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2182323331 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151844032437 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049024186618 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503880604711 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108605392025 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601953553322 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.