Many museum charge for admission fee, do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Among many public infrastructure, museums are the one that successfully provide an excellent way for local citizens as well as the travelers learn the local culture and history. While be effected by many variables, some museums asking for admission fee and this phenomenon have rose wide concern from the public. Personally, I hold the view of the negative influence weights more.
Charging for financial may damage the popularity of museum within general public, and thus weaken the original purpose of building one. With a certain amount of financial threshold in museum, people less likely to visit, as the free resource of the same contend could easily be found via internet. Besides, the majority of the visitor are either constitute by foreign tourist or school children, seldom does an individual actively search for information in museum if he/she is not driven by the work at hand or research requirement. Therefore, adding the entrance fee would definitely shrink its visitor, since the organized group trips in museum, in most cases, are aimed at its minimum cost over the knowledge gained from this tour.
However, it is irrefutable that charging admission fee, for the museum itself, is beneficial. With the fund collected from each visitor, the inner equipment such as air-conditioner, security facility would be updated to its newest version, and prevented the situation of precious antiques getting stolen or guests complaining about poor public facility. What is more, the adequate fund could also be invested in improving understanding and appreciation among visitors, if hiring guider to follow the needed guest and present detailed explanation and interaction, the overall experience of such trip must be more rewarding and informative than without.
in conclusion, better experience among visitors is under the premise of willingly to afford for the trip, considering the negative impact of the admission fee acts on the public's desire for this trip, I believe that disadvantages prevail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... damage the popularity of museum within general public, and thus weaken the original purpose o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ing and informative than without. in conclusion, better experience among vis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in general, such as, as well as, in most cases, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4082278481 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84627754551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651898734177 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4083509474 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.363636364 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226338714292 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963057827759 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956137345901 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140603422101 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363718381228 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.