An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this case? What can be done to reduce this problem?
Public consumption has greatly increased with the general promotion of average individual income and a boost of business development. While with the enjoyment of affluent physical material, yet we should not ignore the environmental burden that we posed for meeting material demands of the general public.
As is well known to all, the manufacture of a product would involve certain raw material and intensive labor, while what is often being put behind is the indirect exploiting of natural resources as well as the we to the landfill. Take electrical products for example, nearly all the intelligent devices contains micro chips and plastic shell for maintaining attracting appearance, but the two material both involve mineral exploiting and energy exhausting and can hardly recycle. To make it even worse, smart device have became a main stream for future commerce and the public seems to be addicted to the accompany of labor replacement products. Without more advanced recycling methods or curtail the consumption of such commodities, environmental well-being is at highly risk.
For addressing the current environmental torture we have being through, all stakeholders must jointly devote their efforts. Policy makers are expected to introduce more strict legislation towards industrial waste water treatment and toxin gas emission, considering the potential contamination of soil and air quality. Besides, consumers may establish a right consumption value and avoid unnecessary repurchase and waste to cater green behaviour concept, to resist the impulse of buying certain products solely for its appearance and reduce throwing away staff that have not ran out its usefulness. Business man also have the obligation of balancing profit and effect when making decision.
In general, the increasing population and demand certainly require more towards our nature where all our living material is provided. However, the obligation of returning back still have a long way to go.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...development. While with the enjoyment of affluent physical material, yet we shoul...
^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...sed for meeting material demands of the general public. As is well known to all, the manu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'we'?
Suggestion: the; we
...loiting of natural resources as well as the we to the landfill. Take electrical produc...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...o make it even worse, smart device have became a main stream for future commerce and t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... and the public seems to be addicted to the accompany of labor replacement products. Without ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 575, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...educe throwing away staff that have not ran out its usefulness. Business man also h...
^^^
Line 13, column 162, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returning'.
Suggestion: returning
...is provided. However, the obligation of returning back still have a long way to go.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng back still have a long way to go.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, may, so, still, well, while, for example, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59735973597 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90072913968 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6699669967 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9541608278 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.333333333 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114390490315 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373560753995 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279869920898 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607626593178 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251022632664 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.