The modern tendency of postponing child bearing in some country has drawn worldwide attention. With consideration of the potential impact this trend may exert, personally, I believe that the age gap between children and parents continue to grow serves a beneficial than detrimental purpose.
From the family’s stand point, delaying in child delivery helps the of spouse’s career development and prepare more adequate financial power for the kids’ future needs. Given that the new married couples are, majority, at the early stage of their businesses, having a child at this stage may greatly affect the work efficiency. As few could be able to balance from workload and child caring to a proper degree without omitting each part of them. Besides, as the spouse just taking off in their career, and are less likely to have accumulated sufficient fund for paying off house mortgage, let alone the ability for covering infants’ maintenance fee. Conversely, if considering having baby when the family as well as the spouse have been mature enough, the relation of this marriage is stable and strong, both the newborn and the parents are better able to truly enjoy of being a family.
However, the downsides of delaying have children is rather apparent in terms of social and newborn’s health. On the one hand, the increase gap between two generation’s age contributes to aging issue, therefore, putting the countries potential at risk and increase the burden of social welfare. On the other, maternal wholesome directly influences the physical well-being of her offspring. As mother growing older, her physical condition is experiencing a downward trend, and the evidence of age can be generally found on the vulnerable and weak physical traits of the children. While with the advancement in science and technology, the concern above may be resolved automatically.
In general, the evidence of increased age gap between parents and kids is less intimidating than it seems to be, and generally, it may help fostering the better next generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to foster' or 'foster'.
Suggestion: to foster; foster
...seems to be, and generally, it may help fostering the better next generation.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94772657038 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.271772422 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.615384615 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119983986666 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427009157399 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532484229322 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996145992262 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057553981214 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.