Wastage of food has turned into a trend while it purchaising from shop, especially from the restaurants. There are several reason of this and some countermeasure should be taken to cut down the food waste.
One of the major cause of wasting food is through ordering many food from a restaurants. People believe that if you eat all food you have ordered you are not following the standarity of eating food. For example, in almost every European country waste huge amount of food when they eat setting at the restaurant to follow a bad trend, standarity. Therefore, in those regions, millions of tons of food are being ruined per year. Furthermore, some waste food without their willingness. people buy some extra food while purchasing just to make sure that they have enough food in case they feel hungry and those food, after passing long hour, if it is not eaten, was wasted.
To counter this problem, we should follow some strict rules. First of all, we should not order extra food from restaurant, if more food is needed later on, can be ordered after finishing the first one. If one can eat a burger at a time he should not order two, in case he wants to eat another one, he can ask for it compliting the first. The second measure that can be put into practice is storing food in a good way. If more food is bought that can be preserved in the fridge or cover well in fuel paper so that if the food is not consumed in time it will not be rotten.
In conclusion, buing and ordering extra food and not to store it properly are the principle reason food waste. The culture of ordering more food in restuarants, and buying extra food should be in control or preserve rest food in refrigerator to lessen the wastege of food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
...ecially from the restaurants. There are several reason of this and some countermeasure should ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...use of wasting food is through ordering many food from a restaurants. People believe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun food seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much food', 'a good deal of food'.
Suggestion: much food; a good deal of food
...use of wasting food is through ordering many food from a restaurants. People believe that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a restaurant' or simply 'restaurants'?
Suggestion: a restaurant; restaurants
...food is through ordering many food from a restaurants. People believe that if you eat all foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...e waste food without their willingness. people buy some extra food while purchasing ju...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'those foods'?
Suggestion: this food; those foods
...nough food in case they feel hungry and those food, after passing long hour, if it is not ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...extra food and not to store it properly are the principle reason food waste. The cu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51910828025 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40778021718 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2781735366 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414254393059 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163689596288 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739776230374 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263339112515 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807701714374 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.