Nowadays, social media should include more good news in their publications. Do you agree or disagree?
To increase the viewership, many publishers have recently exaggerated the bad news, while many people prefer to more positive news contained in the media. Personally, I completely agree that good news should be frequently reported in news coverage.
There are two major rationales why negative news dominating the headlines have an adverse influence on society. Firstly, this type of news may keep viewers in a state of stress as well as lead them to experience trauma. In Vietnam for instance, this country is facing with fatal epidemic called coronavirus, however, the large number of people passed away that posting publicly, which renders to instil fear in their minds. Secondly, frequent exposure to tragic news events may distort readers’ perception of reality that means members of the media solely concentrate on sensational journalism regardless reliable news or not. As a result, this shapes reader’s outlook on society in a pessimistic way.
However, I believe that good news covered in the media are able to bring about a range of benefits in terms of desirable psychological implications. On the one hand, it helps viewers become more optimistic because of encouraging messages. In particular, the patients who suffering serious health diseases such as lung cancer or blood cancer were actually raised their spirits. The explorations about new medicine or therapy on the newspapers are like panacea which stimulates them to struggle with their sickness. On the other hand, the beneficial news also restore human’s faith in the community, which not only inspires individuals to work but also study. Additionally, such meaningful stories are undoubted to uplift people to become happier and have a sense of fulfillment in their lives.
In conclusion, for the justifications I have mentioned above, I am convinced that trustworthy news related to being more motivated in the society may play a crucial role in human’s life, so that these should take place with high frequency in social media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a pessimistic way" with adverb for "pessimistic"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...this shapes reader’s outlook on society in a pessimistic way. However, I believe that good news co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3197492163 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88238675724 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633228840125 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.44247588 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.214285714 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6428571429 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234983440608 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715721317707 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616263000156 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146567223062 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570128041429 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.