Nowadays some countries encourage people to buy more and more products, while others believe it has negative effects on the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree？
Bare necessities cannot satisfy people’s need due to the improvements in living standard. Although overconsumption can have an adverse influence on our social progress to some extent, I would argue that it will bring more benefits.
One problem associated with people buying an increasing number of products is that the production of manufactural industries will increase, which means that more energies will be used and these products may cause tons of rubbish. The needs for sources will have a dramatic increase and the waste of products can be damaging to the environment. For example, the making of clothes needs massive energies, and some non-biodegradable plastics can have a destructive effect on the environment. As a result, the energies will run out quickly due to the fact that people buy tons of these products, meanwhile, the garbage will be everywhere. People will find it difficult to make Our society sustainable.
On the other hand, the ability of consumers’ consumption plays a crucial role in economic development. Money circulating in the market will stimulate the development of business, since many companies can get loans to open their new branches. For instance, the electronic devices produced by the Huawei Company are very popular among people, if each customer buys several products from this company, Huawei will have enough capital to open new branches and develop new technologies. As a consequence, t people can get a better experience using their products and live a happier life. What’s more, when these companies get a huge profit, they will pay more taxes, and these taxes can be used to build more public facilities.
In conclusion, although overconsumption may cause a waste of source and even environmental degradation, it is still likely for people to enjoy this kind of rich materials life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...y for people to enjoy this kind of rich materials life.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2813559322 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09725532044 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596610169492 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5853120231 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.846153846 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139152469897 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501629906989 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425725705145 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821478676744 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339103278579 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.