Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Some employers now prioritize formal academic qualifications over life experience and personal virtues while selecting job candidates. There are several reasons for this, and I believe this brings both positive and negative impacts.
Given the 21st century has witnessed enormous technological developments and breakthroughs, humans are experiencing changes in the way of doing things. In the employment sphere, in particular, a great number of physically demanding jobs are now carried out by automation, leaving manual workers redundant and highly skilled occupations on the rise. As highly skilled positions require specialized knowledge and skills, which only can be attained in formal studying contexts, qualifications have become quintessential.
This trend in employment brings both favorable and negative outcomes. Firstly, it provides a spur for the growth of higher education. As those with a formal degree will be preferably evaluated, higher education will become a necessity if one’s future career is guaranteed. This will lead to an increasing number of university goers, thus creating a highly educated and knowledgeable workforce, which is a deciding factor in enhancing the country’s economic prosperity. Regarding adverse impacts, when less valued, the life experience of a student will be restricted to just school settings or even the library, where he or she burns the midnight oil for the sake of a greater qualification. This will cause them to be ill-equipped for their adult life, which requires more than just academic knowledge.
In conclusion, the rising popularity of highly skilled jobs due to technological advancements is the main culprit why employers make formal education attainment their prime consideration when choosing new employees. This development has both advantages and disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as both advantages and disadvantages.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, regarding, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84132841328 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27084254732 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660516605166 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.991968993 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242143999619 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786578193575 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653592143436 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151729675124 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682733159312 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.