Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that companies have prioritized candidates’ degrees over their life experience and personalities during the recruitment process. There are two main reasons for this trend, and in my opinion, its disadvantages considerably outweigh the advantages.
I acknowledge that the option to considering candidates’ academic degrees to be the most essential recruitment criterion is appealing for two major reasons. First, academic qualifications speak a volume of candidates’ knowledge. In fact, when they pursue higher education, they have to study a wide range of academic subjects which provide them with a mountain of understanding about the fields they would work for after graduation. Second, in some specialized jobs such as teachers, or doctors, academic qualifications are reliable evidence to showcase a major-related grasp of candidates. In other words, they are skillfully and carefully trained to prepare for their career prospects when they are still at university or institutions.
Personally, I hold a strong belief that this trend is completely negative. One of the most significant disadvantages is that companies are more likely to miss qualified candidates if they put too much focus on formal education background. More noticeably, life experience and characteristics would play an important role in dealing with unexpected situations such as handling customers’ complaints. Another disadvantage to consider is some qualification-related issues such as fake bachelor’s degrees would gain increasing popularity in the job-hunting market. Some candidates would buy degrees illegally to be qualified for vacancies and pass the CV testing round.
To conclude, in my view, although possessing a degree is of great importance, I do not think selecting candidates should hugely depend on this recruitment requirement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017. 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 61
- The graph below shows the average daily spending of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 89
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81918819188 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52796475522 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7038362795 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209195429625 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674933834477 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034260425393 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105684981128 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585614820098 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.