Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/ disagree with this view?
Recruiters currently tend to favor candidates who have formal academic qualifications over those with only life experiences or personal attributes. Although the trend occurs for several reasons, this may have an adverse influence on our society.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why people opt for a degree than experience. First, candidates with scholastic qualifications are believed to be equipped with in-depth knowledge and useful skills, which are necessary for future jobs. For instance, a candidate for the biology teacher position is required to have a great deal of knowledge at university as well as spend a lot of time to practice and carry out experiments, which can somehow prove through medical study qualifications. Second, selecting the candidate base on the common criteria certificate may significantly diminish the time to tailor the suitable applicants for the position. As a result, recruiters presumably equate academic qualifications to excellent credentials for the occupation, leading to higher efficiency and greater contributions to the company.
On the other hand, personal skills and life experience also play a pivotal role in the recruitment process. First and foremost, a degree does not signal whether a person possesses essential personal traits such as discipline, self-confidence and responsibility. Such personalities of employees are the needs for a great working-environment and the sustainable of the organization. On top of that, since employees have a penchant for over-relying on their formal academic knowledge and lack of skills, they consequently devote tremendous effort in dealing with their clients in real-life predicaments and might not crises as effectively as those with life experience.
In conclusion, the priority of formal academic qualifications over life experience or personal characteristics in the recruitment process has been widely highlighted as an emerging issue for many reasons. However, hiring authorities of a company should reach the balance between social skills and other important qualifications for the job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gh the trend occurs for several reasons, this may have an adverse influence on ou...
^^
Line 7, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r important qualifications for the job.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74038461538 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4012058788 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0596681272 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.769230769 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7692307692 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252309364531 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900437067355 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477395083569 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16039231654 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185027239113 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.