Some people believe that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the most reliable solution in address traffic accidents is to raise a higher age limit for drivers and riders. However, the question of whether this is the optimal method to improve our current traffic situation or here are much better measures to reduce traffic accidents is one that cannot be answered easily.
On the one hand, raising the minimum age to drive does indeed address one of the leading causes of traffic accidents: mistake in driving resulting from the young drivers, who often lack caution and patience. By raising the age requirement for car driving and motorbike riding, we could reduce the number of young and often inexperienced people on the road, and therefore lower the death toll associated with traffic accidents. However, this approach is only effective to a limited extent, due to the fact that nowadays many youngsters still drive without a driving license, which makes this solution presumably lack effectiveness in real life.
On the other hand, I would argue that there are much better methods of ensuring road safety. The first one is to have stricter punishments for driving offenders which will make traffic participants respect the law, and traffic accidents can be limited. For example, people who break traffic rules should be required to pay huge fines or be sentenced for longer prison time for very serious offenses. Another potential solution is to encourage people to use public transport rather than private vehicles. This can be done by reducing the price and increasing the frequency of buses and tubes to make it more convenient for users.
In conclusion, apart from increase the minimum legal age for driving a car and motorbike, I believe a more suitable approach would be a combination of multiple changes in different aspects of traffic that can lessen all the causes of traffic accidents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... limit for drivers and riders. However, the question of whether this is the optimal method to improve o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umably lack effectiveness in real life. On the other hand, I would argue that th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, therefore, apart from, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07817589577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5999036087 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7676606897 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.727272727 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201774890302 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785760330925 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521119088094 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132935505819 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513303698843 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.