Nowadays sport is becoming a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways Is it a positive or negative development of sport

The inclusion of corporates in sports is common these days, it is often seen that business professionals pour a huge amount of sums on players as well finance in several other ways. This is certainly a positive development, however, its adverse side should not be neglected.

To begin with, since entrepreneurs have stepped into the field of sports, player's economic status has drastically increased. firstly In the past around 1970 cricket player's used to receive a low salary because they were being paid solely by the cricket board, due to that many former cricketers gave up their games and elected another job to run their livelihood. But at present gamers earn beyond their imagination, for example, in the Indian Premier League New Zealand's pacer Kyle Jemison was sold for 160 million INR just for one season, however, after getting a gigantic amount from his franchise his responsibility as a player had emerged more, which he had proven by giving extraordinary performances throughout the season. this means making a huge investment in players encourage them to give a competitive performance which is a significant way to improves the standard of that particular game. Apart from this when these entrepreneurs allocate a huge amount of money to any team or players, they expect more revenue in return by promoting their products by eminent sports personalities so it is a win-win situation for both either player or franchise owner.

On the other hands, sometimes extensive funding on a player from corporate turn them into the gold digger due to the fact, they always tend to run behind the most profitable league, for example, the West Indies cricket board had banned their senior players for a few years because prefered participating in money showering cricket league instead of national duties. Furthermore, it is sometimes seen that sports professional are indulged in match-fixing just for the sake of earning more money, like in 2013 Indian premier league few sports persons were suspected of fixing after that Indian cricket board terminated the entire team for the next two additions, consequently many other new talents who was expecting to be part for next season felt disappointed. In addition, entrepreneurs do not like to put their money low earning sports events, they always invest in the most profitable games.

In conclusion, while some activities like sports merchandising or earning from sport are beneficial for sportsmen to some extent, I believe there are few drawbacks which should be taken into account by sports authorities to flourish sports industry.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...nomic status has drastically increased. firstly In the past around 1970 cricket players...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ary performances throughout the season. this means making a huge investment in playe...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... either player or franchise owner. On the other hands, sometimes extensive ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, apart from, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21241050119 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82432395143 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584725536993 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.05527398 49.4020404114 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.545454545 106.682146367 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0909090909 20.7667163134 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.8181818182 7.06120827912 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189397127659 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748488897669 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553616921899 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133643115187 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398312513942 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.0946893788 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.