Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for e.g., through cellphone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern world, due to technological progress, we are always being watched. Some people might think that such monitoring systems bring a bit of drawback too. However, I support the positive side of it and agree with those who think such technologies are more beneficial.
Those who oppose the digital monitoring technology may argue that such systems disturb our personal freedom. This is because since our every movement is being tracked, some of us may feel uneasy and sometimes even insecure. For example, when we are fetching money from ATM, the camera installed in the booth is recording our every activity.
Sometimes we may feel uncomfortable as we do not know what they will do with the footage. As a result of these today, some people do not prefer to enjoy their leisure time in public places as they used to do in the past.
However, I think that like any other technology this innovation also brings endless benefits to our daily living. Out of these, the most significant one is that it makes our security system ever stronger. For example, unlike a few decades ago, now, we can refer the CCTV footage to catch a criminal or investigate a crime. Thus, we can speed up the investigation process and make the trial more efficient. Similarly, we can get immediate notification if someone is in danger. We can track find our lost phones and even vehicles by equipping GPS tracking systems on them. Therefore, I think, it makes us feel more secure, rather than insecure.
In conclusion, despite several arguments against the digital monitoring system, I strongly support this system as it makes our day-to-day life more secure and boosts efficiency in the security system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, similarly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97552447552 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65890642248 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5058908246 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9375 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207200341084 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633747255442 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450938063222 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11709041701 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451324630313 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.