nowadays technology is influencing modern art in areas such as design painting and film
In today fast paced world technology has a big impact on a lot of human aspects, as well as on modern art. Many people believe that this is an increasingly significant influence of design, painting and film industry. This essay will argue why the effect of today technology is entirely affirmative development despite some potential problems.
The current art will be less humanitarian, as some researches claimed. Not only diverse artists from the whole world are progressed with the modern achievements, but also robots. More specifically, it is possible that robots will have done various art works by a few next years, due to the fact that there is has <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">already </span>been made a big progress in these field. To give an example, some robots with artificial intelligence are now able to create bits of music, simple to one of Beethoven or Mozart, while others are trying to create perfect masterpieces even without that knowledge and skills that the humanity has learn and enhanced for centuries and decades. These few instances have bolstered existing fears about what technology has done to the general modern arts as well as future predictions.
Despite the minor real possibilities to supersede humans by machines, more people understood the main significance of cutting-edges achievements, which help artists to show their ideas better. With the current vast majority of diverse techniques, ways, devices it is simpler as ever has been to concentrate on the idea of what the creator want to convey, owning the fact that a lot of ancient problems do not distribute him now. So, needless to say, for instance, the lack of dye or paper, or impossibility to remove something go to the background, especially it could be noticed in work of film editors, and the general creating of both films, cartoons, drawings, designs. Overall, the technological success give more possibilities and opportunities for artists of all ages, sexes and races to concentrate mainly on the idea of the creation.
To sum up, this essay argued that technology has increasingly beneficial impact on new arts despite of some risks that human creators will be replaced with robots, which is not completely likely to happen. In my point of view, as one of them, who has already influenced by people success in this field, I truly believe that it is only a positive development with big benefits in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opment despite some potential problems. The current art will be less humanitaria...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'big progress'.
Suggestion: big progress
...19.36px;'>already been made a big progress in these field. To give an example, som...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 667, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...wledge and skills that the humanity has learn and enhanced for centuries and decades....
^^^^^
Line 9, column 844, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate mainly on the idea of the creation. To sum up, this essay argued that techno...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15326633166 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13273360629 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565326633166 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6482681682 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167500477451 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617374613826 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629151177078 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111596903715 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081198660895 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.