Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
The significance of technology which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, at present most of the individuals contact with each other through modern technology. In my opinion, it would be a would be a great ways. In my opinion improvement in modern society. This essay will elaborate the reasons attributing to this trend in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with a large number of people depend on advanced technology to build up relationship between different person. Besides, the ways at communication in new digital era, which are more demandable such as face book, Instagram, what's app, twitter. For an example, nowadays though young generation like to use social media, many older individuals also want to browse and both are able to make new friendship along with try to search old friends. In addition, those apps are using among the people to maintain mutual contacts continuously from day to night, which was impossible in earlier. Hence, it is clear that a huge number of individuals are taking care of relationship through several apps.
On the other hand, using latest technology is a practical development in a country. To take an example, most of the company owners consult with employees as well as take order from other industries via what's app, zoom meeting. Moreover, students also attend classes from home in online while institute are closed and take preparation properly. Thus, such kind of rewards can be made improved community.
To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of technology are to indeed too great. However, everyone should be maintained these ways to build up relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...opinion, it would be a would be a great ways. In my opinion improvement in modern so...
^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he looming paragraphs. To begin with a large number of people depend on advanced technology to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...emandable such as face book, Instagram, whats app, twitter. For an example, nowadays ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to maintain mutual contacts continuously from day to night, which was impossible ...
^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'using the latest'.
Suggestion: using the latest
...ugh several apps. On the other hand, using latest technology is a practical development i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...as take order from other industries via whats app, zoom meeting. Moreover, students a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16783216783 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86158426092 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625874125874 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.351531492 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256205369581 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680591361481 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616638720228 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132159701063 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458997264557 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.