Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Innovations in technology have redefined how we communicate and build relationships. These changes have demolished barriers such as distance that normally prevent us from keeping in touch with loved ones. In my opinion, these advancements help keep the bond that connects people strong and also help enrich personal relationships.
Social media platforms such as Facebook has made it possible for families and friends to be updated about each other’s personal status. For instance, through messages posted in one’s account, other people are able to learn if a friend is doing great or not. This can help in determining whether a troubled friend needs support or encouragement. Indeed, social networks can help deepen friendships by giving us means to look out for each other’s personal welfare.
Equally significant are live streaming features available in numerous app. Oftentimes, people working overseas miss out on special occasions. Through live streaming, they are able to witness the event in real time which can help make them feel like they are part of the celebration. Hence, technology can bring families closer even if they are separated by distance, thus making every event a family event.
In summary, advancements in technology have positively impacted our way of maintaining and nurturing personal relationships. It has helped us find ways to bridge distance and become part of each other’s lives despite not being physically close. It has helped keep families ties strong and lessen the impact of absence for separated family members. Lastly, it has helped deepen friendships by giving us means to keep eye on each other especially for friends who might be facing some difficult times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... each other's personal welfare. Equally significant are live streaming features...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thus making every event a family event. In summary, advancements in technology h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, lastly, look, so, thus, for instance, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41481481481 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88608600971 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618518518519 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5130350811 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.4666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150392878302 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509457793301 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365159067975 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862790352915 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254267277065 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.