Nowadays, young people tend to buy the things which are modern than traditional ones. What are the cause? Is this a positive or negative trend?
In today's modern society, young people are prone to spend money to buy modernized things instead of traditional-related goods. With some causes mentioned below, I opine that this trend is positive.
There are several compelling reasons for this. First, technological advances are inexorably increasing, which causes customers to have more chances to have access to a number of different ways of goods consumption. In addition, the target demographic that the shops and goods companies aim at is mostly the young; therefore, they almost sell trendy and luxurious goods to empower individuals' spending power. This leads to the fact that the popularity of traditional goods is on the decline, while those modern goods dominate. For example, youngsters nowadays have a tendency to buy colorful, lovely, multi-faceted home furniture rather than spend the same budget to buy a wooden one.
With all the reasons mentioned above, it is notable that this is a positive trend. The decrease in conventional crafts consumption does not mean that they disappear completely so that the nation and local areas still maintain ethnic and cultural diversity. Thus, this trend not only opens the door to economic development for business-related units but also enhances the financial stability of the municipal areas as well as the country. Moreover, the more young people can approach more stylish and trendier goods, the higher chances they may have to spur their opportunities to improve their socio-economic backgrounds.
To conclude, that young people decide to allocate money to modern goods in place of traditional ones has some valid causes and also brings advantageous aspects to the government and individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40977443609 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00195208504 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1569905733 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32091919417 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104319597974 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740452179193 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198103627432 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773699704287 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.