Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?
Some argue that nuclear power should be adopted as the major energy source to satisfy the world’s rocketing demand for electricity. In my opinion, nuclear power is indeed a relatively more appropriate choice, however, there is also potential danger involved.
To commence with, Nuclear power has a major environmental benefit. Many nations have been using nuclear energy instead of coal-fired alternative sources to generate electricity, which is positive to the air quality and the climate because nuclear plants do not emit gases conducive to global warming, acid rain, or urban smog. For instance, in 2013, Chinese nuclear plants have avoided fifty million tons of CO2 emission that would have resulted if the electricity were produced by fossil fuels.
In addition, nuclear energy has high productivity and minimal climatically and geographical limitations. Nuclear reactors, which only require a relatively small amount of land, utilize a small quantity of feedstock input (Uranium) to generate a huge amount of energy continuously. By contrast, to obtain equivalent renewable energy, an extensive solar farm or countless wind turbines and a much longer time are required. Furthermore, these power plants have to be built on certain landforms and operated in suitable weathers.
However, it is undeniable that nuclear plants may be dangerous in some circumstances. The principal risks associated with nuclear power arise from radiation, which can penetrate deep inside human body to damage biological cells and thereby initiate cancer. A nuclear leak may also occur during catastrophic natural disasters or because of human error. In 1986, a nuclear plant in Chernobyl, Ukraine experienced a tragic explosion due to the operator's error. This resulted in an enormous international spread of nuclear leak, which is still radioactive after decades.
In conclusion, although I reckon that the world should accept nuclear power as an energy source which is superior to other ones in many ways, it should also be noted that there are risks of this technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'operators'' or 'operator's'?
Suggestion: operators'; operator's
...perienced a tragic explosion due to the operators error. This resulted in an enormous int...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, for instance, i reckon, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4921630094 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8607587809 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5001683499 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177172675152 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637319846357 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447989302077 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105408457111 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334442033723 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.