In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people in many be countries believe it is vital to spend greater amount al money on building new railway lines for high speed trains between cities. Whereas, others opine that the money must be spent on developing transport used by public. In my opinion, I agree with the latter point of view.
On one hand, people who support spending on the larger fraction of money on constructing new railway lines for greater speed trains think that it will reduce the number of accidents caused by these trains and for the smooth movement of these trains. If same railway lines are used for low speed and high speed trains, then it will cause many accidents as low speed trains cannot estimate when high speed trains come to the same railway lines. Also, larger speed trains have to wait for longer time periods if slow moving trains arrive on the same railway lines. Then the advantage of time saving cannot be made by people who travel in fast moving trains.
On the other hand, people who argue that the money should be spent for improving public transport think that this provides more advantages than spending on building new railway lines. Firstly, they think that people can travel comfortably if the money is spent on improving transport like buses or low speed trains.
This way time taken to travel will also reduce as the speed increases with the higher quality of transport. If the money is spent on building new railway lines for greater speed trains, then it will lead to high expenditure and higher crowd on these trains. People do not prefer to travel on crowded transport though it saves time.
In my opinion, higher amount of money should be spent on developing public transport because of the comfort it provides to the public.
In conclusion, more money should be spent on improving the quality of public transport rather than building new railway lines for faster trains.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s for high speed trains between cities. Whereas, others opine that the money must be sp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84049079755 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20512680241 2.80592935109 79% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407975460123 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7475258333 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405506782771 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168306222652 0.084324248473 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114374674387 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262723173536 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898921028449 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.