In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
people are travelling more than ever before, hence the demand for transportation improvements has been seen in many countries. while some individuals believe that government should spend much money on new railway lines construction, I would argue that money should be spent on improving public transportation.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why new railway lines should be created. The first reason is that trains would be made faster. For those who are highly in need of commuting between cities, it will be more convenient for them to spend less time sitting on a train. Additionally, the fact that people are more likely to switch to using trains instead of using other types of transportation will benefit our living environment. For instance, one may change from driving a car to commuting by trains, thus less fossil fuel emissions are made and the air will be fresher for us to breathe.
On the other hand, I believe improving existing public transport is extremely necessary. first, roads and streets should be upgraded in both sizes and quality. This will reduce the number of unexpected accidents and drivers could feel safe when being on their journeys. What is more, government's spending on building and enlarging metro lines is essential nowadays. Because of the fact that subways serve a huge amount of people every day, there will be less people driving and the question on how to solve traffic jams in urban areas will be answered.
In conclusion, while there are opinions that a large amount of money should be spent on new railway lines construction, I believe that government should pay attention to ameliorate other types of public transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people are travelling more than ever before, h...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ements has been seen in many countries. while some individuals believe that governmen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ublic transport is extremely necessary. first, roads and streets should be upgraded i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: Because
...ging metro lines is essential nowadays. Because of the fact that subways serve a huge amount of people e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ount of people every day, there will be less people driving and the question on how ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07553956835 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71745627455 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7338528726 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.538461538 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413353413004 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140177580084 0.084324248473 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100573495277 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272147598717 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809888890967 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.