In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The railway systems are expanding around the globe. Whilst some individuals advocate that railway companies or governments should arrange more budget for building new high speed lines, others argue that the money should be used on the optimization of existing systems. As for me, I believe that governments should examine the needs of people and industries carefully before they make decisions.
To begin with, the expansion of railway systems is demanded in some countries, especially the developing countries. With the rapid growth of economy, the transportation between cities becomes vital. Take China for instance, after the reformation of its economy policies, cities in China are experiencing huge developments. The connection between commercial centers such as Beijing and Shanghai becomes closer and more frequent than before. The authorities must extend the existing lines as well as constructing new lines for fast trains, in order to satisfy the demand of commuting. In addition, the construction program can provide plenty of opportunities of employment, which can benefits the labours in countryside or towns by the railway lines.
On the other hand, some nations have already developed large scale of high-speed rail. For example, Japan pioneers in research and development of high-speed rail. The high-speed rail, Shinkansen, owned by Japan Railways connects most of the big cities on the islands. However, the demand of commuting went saturated in recent years. Thus, the company changes its target and invest the research program on making faster trains instead of expanding the system. Also, the money are put into the maintenance of the trains, rails, and stations. On the top of that, the authorities are managing to make the connection stronger between high-speed rail and other public transportation systems, such as buses, local lines, and airplanes.
In conclusion, the aim on public transportation of countries varies. I suggest that governments or railway enterprises should do analysis and be wary of spending money on constructions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
... opportunities of employment, which can benefits the labours in countryside or towns by ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, thus, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55205047319 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96203256489 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.661638882 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291316851367 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763498306614 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602397296679 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176229654285 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471131543329 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.