In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport discuss both thes

In some societies, people argue that the government should invest a significant amount of money on a new generation of fast trains to make connections between cities, while others suggest that it's unnecessary due to the vital importance of upgrading the existing transportation service. Obviously, both notions have benefits and drawbacks, but I believe in another idea because of the following reasons.
First of all, there is no doubt about the probable possibilities and facilities that a new railway system could offer to the public, nevertheless, most people prefer to use a private vehicle or even a less crowded shared system in order to moving back and forth between different places. Thus, investing a huge amount of money on very fast trains could be a waste of money, yet, the government should invest on developing a high-tech transportation system which could be more beneficial in the long-term.
On the other hand, although, public transport in many countries has confronted with various issues due to the lack of sufficient investment over long periods, but it needs an enormous amount of money to become up-to-date. Therefore, starting a project for developing a digitilized way of transportation would permit to each nation to become the first-ranked in a new technology. For instance, Japan started a project in order to expand a transportation system by 2050 which is fully digital and works by an AI assistant.
In conclusion, some people presume that investing on a new railway system would help the society and others believe in improving the old public transport. In my opinion, working on a project to make a connection between digital technology and transportation system would have undeniable benefits in the foreseeable future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23758865248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09071187176 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6813954575 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.111111111 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8888888889 7.06120827912 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296694328871 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116273197174 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748325898274 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177908510201 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370406039129 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.