In many locations around the world, people have different views about whether a huge number of money should be used for building high-speed railway lines to connect cities. While some argue that it should be used for the development of existing public transport systems, I believe that spending for new railway lines is better idea.
There are some reasons why people believe that using money for old public transport. The main reason is many old vehicles such as buses or ships make atmosphere become worse. For example, in developing countries, old buses are very common which produce tons of smoke day by day. Another reason is current public transport is what people use every day so that developing it seems to be less pollution for environment. By contrast, I think that the cost of the upgrade is very high for this transport systems and this money could be use in a more effective way.
This leads to the idea that constructing high speed railway lines. Firstly, with the development of technology in recent years, very fast trains had faster speed than plane which could make us more time for each ride. Secondly, train travel is one of the cheapest ways to travel and allow most people’s financial. For instance, college students also can have enough money for these train tickets. Finally, if most people use fast trains to moving, harmful emissions can be reduced significantly.
In conclusion, improving public transportation is a positive thing that brings many benefits but I think that it is more productive for the appearance of new railway lines for fast-speed trains with the same amount of money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97058823529 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55027307039 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4039782214 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366508997993 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135744622947 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883092154274 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239301383839 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482786726535 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.