In some countries some people opine that money should be used for building new rapid train railway lines. Meanwhile, others think that the money is better to be used for bettering current public transportation. I completely agree with the latter view that it is better to use the money to upgrade current public transportation.
On the one hand, spending money for building new rapid train railway lines is beneficial because it can help support more rapid trains to operate. The more rapid trains that operate, the less traffic congestion will occur. This is because, rapid train can operate swiftly and has its own railway, so it can eliminate the time that is needed for passengers to travel from one place to another place. However, the fare for riding rapid train is usually expensive, so people will not likely to choose them over their private vehicles. As a result, traffic congestion problem will not be eliminated.
On the other hand, using money for improving the current public transportation is advantageous because it can increase the quality of public transportation to be more comfortable and safe for riding. The better the public transportation, the bigger the chance for citizens to switch from their private vehicles. If a lot of citizens choose public transportation over their private transportation, traffic congestion problem will most likely to be eliminated. Moreover, compared to rapid train, the fare of existing public transportation such as Bus and MRT is usually affordable. Hence, the chance of people to switch to public transportation will be bigger and traffic congestion problem will be overcome.
In conclusion, spending money for building rapid train railways is great because it can support more rapid trains to operate, which will result to less traffic congestion to occur. However, because usually rapid train has expensive fare, it is better to use the money for improving current public transportation, which has bigger chance to replace people's choice in riding their private vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27692307692 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87443907572 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406153846154 0.561755894193 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8333200531 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270643739979 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116546518645 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743911533164 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196921263121 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529583401465 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.